For some, delegation is like cod liver oil – it might lead to a good outcome, but it is so distasteful, they don’t try it. Others see delegation as the solution to all their time management problems – give the work to someone else, and all will be right with the world. Neither is the best way to look at this important skill. Delegation is valuable and needed, and far too often done poorly or not at all.
In this article, I will break down the three key pieces of delegation, the foundations upon which your delegation practices must be built.
Before any of these keys to delegation will work, you must understand what successful delegation is about. Hint: It isn’t about you as the delegator. Yes, done well, you will have less on your plate. But for delegation to be successful over the long haul, your focus must be on helping the other person be successful with their new tasks. Without that mindset, you won’t apply the three keys well, nor would they work well anyway.
With that caveat firmly in mind, here are the three key activities of successful delegation:
Delegation Requires Training
Delegation isn’t dumping. Just walking into someone’s office or sending them an email with an announcement of their new tasks will very rarely work. Think about what good training looks like:
- Explaining the context and purpose for doing the new skill
- Outlining the steps involved in doing the new skill
- Clarifying by answering questions that students might have
In a similar way, when delegating, you must take the time to explain the context of the task, who uses the output of the task, and why the task matters to the organization. You must walk through the steps involved in a way that is helpful to a beginner, and you must encourage questions and answer them.
When you do these three steps, the person to whom you are delegating will be set up to succeed. But you aren’t done yet …
Delegation Requires Trust
Delegation isn’t micro-management. Once you have delegated something to someone, let them do it. If you have set them up to succeed, give people a chance to try it out. Let them walk through the steps and do the task. Will they get it perfect? Maybe not. Will they do it differently than you? Perhaps. Does that even matter? It might not.
If you did the training well, people now understand the task and will apply their own perspective to it, and so you must let them do it. After all, you didn’t delegate to a robot.
Maybe you are ok with trusting them (and if not, you really need to work on that), but still feel they might need help. There is nothing wrong with being available and providing a safety net, but even with a net you can be trusting them to succeed.
Trusting them to do it doesn’t mean you ignore them. They may have questions or need additional guidance. That leads us to the third key …
Delegation Requires Coaching
Delegation isn’t one conversation. When learning a new skill, training alone seldom is enough. People need practice and support in order to master a new skill. Remember that when you are delegating something to someone, it is typically something you have mastered or do very well. You didn’t learn it that well the first time through, and neither will your team members.
If you want to successfully delegate, think of it as an investment. As you invest in supporting and coaching them, they will get better and both of you will feel good about the results of the delegation.
Sometimes delegation just requires two words–“Please handle.”
My boss use to write those words on documents that indicated a customer request or internal problem or request from another department..
He wanted me to figure out what to do and take action as I thought appropriate.
But he also, always gave me a date to have it done by.
One of the problems I see is managers who over-delegate to their one or two super starsl
A consideration that hasn’t been addressed is whether or not the employee has the capability to perform the task. You can’t ask an associate level person to prepare a complex analysis and presentation to senior leaders (for example).
Also, does the employee have the bandwidth in their position to handle the added responsibility?